Wollombi Valley Online
Wollombi Valley Online
Sustainable community, living with heritage, art and nature
Wollombi Valley Country Fair

LEP (Local Environmental Politics)

Updates

Cessnock LEP approved: Planning controls updated
Date: 18-Jan-12
By: Cessnock Advertiser

Draft LEP and your DA
Date: 18-Aug-11
By: Cessnock Council

Cessnock council staff 'disaffected'
Date: 04-Mar-11
By: Joanne McCarthy (The Herald)

Oh $@#* Not Again! Cessnock LEP back on the agenda...
Date: 15-Feb-11
By: Peter Firminger

Wollombi Update - 17 September 2010
Date: 17-Sep-10
By: Peter Firminger

Cessnock Council Takes a step backwards - rejects environment and heritage protection
Date: 16-Sep-10
By: Cessnock-Kurri Greens

Cessnock draft LEP back on exhibition
Date: 30-Jun-10
By: The Advertiser

Draft LEP to be re-exhibited
Date: 24-Jun-10
By: Cessnock City Council

Re-exhibition of Cessnock Draft LEP 2010
Date: 15-Jun-10
By: Peter Firminger

Meeting March 10, 2010 - Wollombi Valley Working Party (draft LEP)
Date: 10-Mar-10
By: Frederic Aubineau

Review Paper - Clause 10
Date: 08-Mar-10
By: Paul Flemming

Addition of Clause 10 to the new LEP
Date: 08-Mar-10
By: Paul and Priscilla Flemming

Cessnock Council will be holding two public briefings in Wollombi Hall on Thursday 3 September 2009 and Sunday 6 September 2009. The documents are currently on display at Wollombi General Store.

Wollombi Valley residents may have recently received a pamphlet being circulated by The Greens Political Party claiming to enlighten us as to the "facts on the Cessnock LEP". Perhaps it should have been more correctly titled ‘observations or opinions', (of which there are numerous) rather than ‘facts' which would be most accurately defined as ‘things that are known to be true' (of which there are few).

It's hard to understand how they can believe that the E3 Environmental Zone is not really a conservation zone, but a rural zone. The following are just some of the developments that are allowed with consent in RU2 Rural Landscape, but prohibited in E3. There are numerous others.

Non-commercial agriculture, agricultural produce industries; animal boarding or training establishments; aquaculture; childcare centres; community facilities; dairies; farm forestry; group homes; health consulting rooms; neighbourhood shops; poultry farms; pubs; recreation facilities for tourists; restaurants; retail premises (primarily for tourists); roadside stalls; rural industries; sawmills; stock and sale yards, tennis courts.

The Greens have also misrepresented the Heritage Conservation provisions. Contrary to what their pamphlet says, development consent or written approval will be required when altering any existing building, work, relic, tree or place within a Heritage Conservation Area, not just items listed in Schedule 5 of the LEP. This includes making changes to the detail, fabric, finish or appearance of the exterior of an existing building. In such a case, the consent authority may also require a Heritage Impact Statement and/or a Heritage Conservation Management Plan to be prepared before granting consent.

The Greens leaflet contains a number of so called ‘facts' which are selective, open to challenge, misleading and which at the very least need much more clarification. We would prefer to await the public exhibition of the final version of Draft LEP 2008, whenever that might eventuate, and expect due regard will have been paid by Council Planners to State Environmental Planning Policy (Rural Lands) 2008, as well as the Report of the Independent Expert Panel December 2007 which conducted A Review of the NSW Heritage Act 1977.

Steve Annis-Brown
Local Environmental Plan Action Group on behalf of Wollombi Valley Progress Association.


The previous content of this page has been archived here

Related Documents

Documents marked with PDF may only be available in PDF format. If you don't have Adobe Acrobat (or the reader), a FREE reader is available from Adobe.

Documents marked with Word may only be available in Microsoft Word format. If you don't have Microsoft Word, a FREE reader is available from Microsoft. Other readers are available here in case the suggested one is not suitable.


Comments (3)

Posted: 14-Mar-08 13:02 by Brian Barnes Permalink

Can i suggest that a couple of standard (sample) letters of complaint are posted on your site for use by members. Organisations like GetUp and Avaaz have found that in order to get the maximum number of people participating in sending emails, they put up a standard letter to the person or organisation they are trying to influence and all you have to do is fill in your details. They also allow an option to edit it or personalise it if the sender feels inclined.
I feel sure this would result in many more people participating. Regards Brian Barnes.


Posted: 24-Apr-08 09:43 by Sean Gough Permalink

Thanks to Steve Annis-Brown and others for putting across our concerns to Council so succinctly last night. Where do we go from here? If Council intend putting the proposed LEP on display as it stands and only then consider our objections, how can we best present those objections and what would be the process? I propose we soon have a community meeting to discuss the issues raised last night and Council's response, making a plan as to the next steps. Can this be arranged?


Posted: 10-May-08 18:19 by carl hoipo Permalink

At the forum meeting with Council, it was mentioned that the Dept. Agriculture had made a submission to Council re farming potential in the Wollombi district,
and this lead to the environmental Zone being used here. It might be interesting to see what that Ag. Dept. submission was.
Carl Hoipo.


Join or log in to leave a comment